Research Use Only

RESEARCH

Confirm your age

All products are supplied strictly for laboratory and research use only — not for human or veterinary use. By entering, you confirm you are 18 or older and agree to our Terms & Conditions.

Under 18? Leave this site

Laboratory research comparison

CJC-1295 without DAC vs Tesamorelin

A neutral comparison of two distinct synthetic GHRH analogues by research classification, structure and growth-hormone-axis research context.

What is CJC-1295 without DAC?

CJC-1295 without DAC, often described in research catalogues as modified GRF (1-29), is a synthetic 29-residue analogue based on the active N-terminal portion of growth-hormone-releasing hormone. “Without DAC” distinguishes it from material bearing a drug-affinity-complex modification.

What is Tesamorelin?

Tesamorelin is a synthetic analogue based on the 44-residue human growth-hormone-releasing-hormone sequence, with a trans-3-hexenoic-acid modification at its N-terminus. It is a distinct defined peptide rather than another name for CJC-1295 without DAC.

Comparison table

Research classification

CJC-1295 without DAC
Synthetic GHRH analogue based on GRF (1-29)
Tesamorelin
Synthetic GHRH analogue based on GHRH (1-44)

Peptide length

CJC-1295 without DAC
29 amino-acid residues
Tesamorelin
44 amino-acid residues

Defining structure

CJC-1295 without DAC
Modified 1-29 sequence; no DAC group
Tesamorelin
1-44 sequence with an N-terminal trans-3-hexenoic-acid modification

Shared context

CJC-1295 without DAC
GHRH-receptor and growth-hormone-axis laboratory research
Tesamorelin
GHRH-receptor and growth-hormone-axis laboratory research

Interchangeability

CJC-1295 without DAC
A distinct compound requiring its own identity and batch documentation
Tesamorelin
A distinct compound requiring its own identity and batch documentation

GHRH-receptor research context

Both compounds are classified as synthetic GHRH analogues and may be examined in laboratory research concerning GHRH-receptor signalling and the growth-hormone axis. This shared classification is research context, not evidence that their structures, test results or experimental conditions are equivalent.

Similarities and differences

Their similarity lies in their relationship to GHRH-based research. Their peptide lengths, sequence basis and defining modifications differ, so each should be identified by its own compound name and evaluated against its own analytical documentation.

Why they are not interchangeable

A shared research category does not make two compounds interchangeable. Researchers should distinguish their molecular identities, study materials, batch numbers, analytical reports and experimental designs, without transferring a result or conclusion from one compound to the other.

Related research pages

Educational laboratory-research information only. This comparison does not provide medical, therapeutic, dosing, administration or human-use guidance.

Cart

Your cart is empty.